Week 7: Neuroscience and Art 

As an Anthropology Major neuroscience is something that we do not study in my field. However, we do somewhat study art and the different forms of it in each culture. In addition, we also learn to understand why a person thinks the way they dory studying their culture, their economic status and their environment. Like anthropologist who studies an an individuals background; neuroscience can help us understand why a person interprets something different from others. By studying their brain scans neuroscientists can somewhat get an understanding of what is going on. In addition, Neuroscience can also can also be interpreted as a form of art. For example, Giovanni Frazzetto and Suszanne Anker writer of "Nueroculture" states that "artist Jonathan Keats put his Brain, as well as its original thoughts, up for sale...he registered his brain as a sculpture created by himself through the act of thinking...produced an exhibition and catalogue at the San Francisco Modernism Gallery...artwork consist of MRI images of his brain activity..."(Frazzetto & Anker  816). Which can be seen in the image below. 


However, the idea that some individuals will interpret things differently started with "Phrenology". According to Victoria Vesna Lecture 3 video, Phrenology is the attempt to look at a persons character through scans. In addition, Mark Cohen states that in phrenology at one point started to study the  bumps  in a person's head.  Each bump then corresponds to certain brain activity. 



Therefore, our brain can influence how individuals interpret art or if  they can even interpret it. Furthermore, art can also influence neuroscience, by presenting MRI scans as art pieces. Ultimately, I believe that our consciousness is a huge factor of how we interpret art as a whole, because it determines who we are as a person. 










Works cited 

Cohan, Mark. Lecture. 21 May 2017 <http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=eDq8uTROeXU>

Frazzetto, Giovanni. Anker, Suszanne "Nueroculture". web. 21 May, 2017. 

Vesna, Victoria. Lecture "Neuroscience and Art part 2" Web 21May, 2017 

https://www.flickr.com/photos/20939975@N04/7396454674/

http://amp.livescience.com/49060-brain-artwork-gallery.html

http://www.featherofme.com/tag/drawing-2/page/3/

http://www.artbusiness.com/1open/111209.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/3217423.stm

Comments

  1. YIQIAO LIUMay 23, 2017 at 3:43 PM

    I like how you talk about the connections between your major anthropology and neuroscience. Maybe you can elaborate on the relations between these two and art.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Image
Week 4: Art +Medicine + Technology  Before this week I had pretty good understanding how Medicine and Technology intertwined. Many of the new advances in technology has helped and influence further methods Medicine. With that being said I never would have seen or made a connection with Art and Medicine because I cannot understand how Art can influence or help medicine in any way. However, now I see that it is the other way around, Medicine has been influencing art. For example. Professor Vesna in  "Human body and medical technologies" that anatomy and dissection has been a fascination for artist. In other words, artist have been able to see the human body as art. This can also be seen in Silvia Casini's article "Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) as mirror and portrait: MRI Configuration between science and the Arts".  Casini argues that an "MRI as a 'look' in the same way that the portrait has"(Casini 73). To clarify, an MRI has the abilit
Read more
Image
Week 2: Math, Nature, and Art       As a child I always wanted to be a Math teacher. Coincidently, I was a horrible art student that would rather be doing word problems than drawing . My calculus teacher would always tell me “Math is everywhere! You literally are doing math and don’t even know it”(Martha Mata 2012).  However, as young child I remember the countless hours I would spent drawing and coloring. It is only with Richard Buckminster’ concept of de-genuises that I understood what happened to that young child that loved drawing. According to Buckminster “ every single one of us has a genius inside of us”(Lecture 2- Art). Therefore, anyone can be a mathematician or an artist. However, it is when we enter the educational system that we become de-genius.  Based on Buckminster’ concept of de-genius I conclude that I could have been a talented artist or a great mathematician. However, perhaps was limited by the educational system.           Although, some would say that you
Read more